Author: Written by ADCES staff and subject matter expert faculty
September 07, 2025
As continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) becomes more central to diabetes management, healthcare professionals are faced with increasingly complex streams of data. Metrics such as Time in Range (TIR) provide valuable insight into glycemic patterns, but they may not fully capture the risks associated with hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia or the overall quality of glycemic control.
To fill this gap, the Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) was developed as a novel composite score that incorporates both highs and lows into a single, interpretable number. By offering a more complete picture of glycemic variation, the GRI enables clinicians to compare results across multiple CGM reports and patient groups.
According to the Diabetes Technology Society, the GRI is intended to help healthcare professionals—including certified diabetes care and education specialists (CDCESs)—interpret CGM data more effectively. When used alongside Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) reports, it can provide valuable context for clinical decision-making and individualized care planning.
Why GRI?
The GRI was created to enhance CGM interpretation by integrating the severity and distribution of out-of-range glucose values. For example, two people may have similar TIR values, but their experiences with hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia can vary significantly. GRI addresses this by capturing not just time outside the target range but also the degree of risk associated with glucose levels in the hyper and hypoglycemic regions.
What Is GRI?
The Glycemia Risk Index is a single-number score ranging from 0 to 100 that summarizes glycemic patterns based on weighted CGM metrics, with lower scores reflecting less time in high- or low-glucose ranges and higher scores indicating greater glycemic variability with increased time spent in high and low ranges. The index draws from clinician consensus on the importance of different glucose ranges and prioritizing the extremes most associated with potential harm.
Key features:
How Is GRI Calculated?
GRI is based on four standard CGM metrics:
The GRI Formula:
GRI = (3.0 × VLow) + (2.4 × Low) + (1.6 × VHigh) + (0.8 × High)
This calculation reflects aa weighted model based on input from over 330 clinicians who reviewed CGM tracings from 225 individuals living with diabetes (article cited in reference section)
Note: No need to memorize the formula—the DTS offers a free online calculator and a GRI Calculator app.
A Visual Guide
To help with interpretation, the GRI Grid plots:
The graph categorizes glycemic profiles into quintiles (Zones A–E), offering visual cues to:
Sample grid example from DTS.
Clinical Relevance and Applications
The GRI is a practical tool that can be used across multiple settings:
Comparing GRI to TIR
While TIR remains an important and well-validated metric, the GRI adds depth by accounting for the severity of both high and low glucose episodes. Since GRI and TIR are closely correlated (r = -0.91), the value of GRI cannot be dismissed.
Limitations
Accessing the GRI
Access the GRI Calculator
Read the full article with a description of the study undertaken to identify GRI in A Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) of Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Validated by Clinician Ratings
Future Applications
The Glycemia Risk Index represents a potential tool for interpreting CGM data. Its integration of multiple data streams into a single, actionable score makes it particularly valuable as CGM use expands beyond endocrinology into primary care and population health settings.
CGM acceptance by individuals is increasing and an easy way to look at CGM data will enable wider acceptance among healthcare providers. The hope is for future research that will explore GRI’s ability to predict long-term outcomes and complications risk, evaluate user acceptance, and identify its application to individual and population health management. Dashboards that provide the composite GRI value as a metric along with the AGP will further improve and expand care opportunities both in-person and as a remote option.
FAQ 1: Why was the Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) developed if Time in Range (TIR) already exists?
While TIR is a valuable metric, it doesn’t capture the full impact of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Two patients can have similar TIR values but very different risks due to severe highs or lows. GRI was designed to fill this gap by weighting the severity and duration of out-of-range values, providing a single score that reflects overall glycemic risk more completely.
FAQ 2: How does the GRI help healthcare professionals in practice?
The GRI simplifies CGM interpretation by condensing multiple data points into one score. Clinicians can use it to quickly compare patterns across patients, monitor progress over time, and identify who may need additional support. Paired with the Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP), the GRI can guide more personalized treatment and patient education.
FAQ 3: Where can I access and calculate the GRI?
Healthcare professionals don’t need to memorize the formula—the Diabetes Technology Society offers a free online calculator and app. These tools make it easy to generate GRI scores from standard CGM data, helping providers integrate the index into routine care without adding significant workload.
Integrating Diabetes Technology into Primary Care Part 1: Overview and Clinical Scenarios
Integrating Diabetes Technology into Primary Care Part 2: Interactive Case Studies
Putting Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) into Practice Certificate Program, FREE for members
DISCLAIMERS:
This site and its services do not constitute the practice of medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always talk to your diabetes care and education specialist or health care provider for diagnosis and treatment, including your specific medical needs. If you have or suspect that you have a medical problem or condition, please contact a qualified health care professional immediately. To find a diabetes care and education specialist near you, visit the ADCES finder tool.
ADCES and danatech curate product specifics and periodically review them for accuracy and relevance. As a result, the information may or may not be the most recent. We recommend visiting the manufacturer's website for the latest details if you have any questions.